Closet Exhibitionist ([info]haberlach) wrote,
@ 2004-01-19 22:09:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Damnit, what does Adobe have against raw-format workflow?
I have Photoshop CS and Photoshop Album.

Photoshop CS has a decent thumbnail browser that lets me view the thumbnails, rotate them (it notes that it is merely rotating the thumbnail and will actually rotate when I open the image), and open the file into their raw converter plug-in. It will not, however, let me categorize files other then "flag yes/no" and it will not let me move a selection of files into another directory so I can create my own categorization system.

Photoshop Album has a nice thumbnail browser that lets me view the thumbnails. If I want to rotate them, however, I have to let it create a copy of the file in either .jpg, .tif, or .psd format. This either cancels my reason for using raw, bloats my files, or REALLY bloats my files. If I choose not to let it rotate them, and deal with the crick in my neck, I cannot directly invoke Photoshop on the files -- it appears to be trying to handle them itself before it hands it off, so it then claims that Photoshop cannot handle that filetype -- which it CAN, damnit.

Currently, I'm using Album to sort my files, "exporting" a selection to another directory, and then editing and converting in photoshop.

Ugh -- anyone have any suggestions?



(1 comment) - (Post a new comment)

nnnoooo...
[info]jugglervr
2004-01-20 08:38 am UTC (link)
sony seems to hate the raw format too. their raw-capable cameras encrypt the image so that it will only be readable with proprietary sony software. goddamit. if they didn't make such tasty prosumer products, i'd drop them in a second.

(Reply to this)


(1 comment) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…